This week’s Virginia Baptist Religious Herald accuses the “Northern Religious Press” of “Secularity.”
Pretending surprise of “the degree in which the religious papers of the North are devoted to politics,” the writer is silent on the overtly political nature of the Southern Baptist press during the war years.
“Now, we do not call in question the right of the conductors of religious periodicals to introduce into their columns discussions on secular subjects. It is a matter of taste, of usefulness or of profit, which they must decide for themselves. We only wish to say that we discover much in their political articles which we disapprove. We find it necessary to exercise no little self-denial in forbearance to reply to arguments, which seem to us to be fallacious, and which are designed to disparage the people of the South; but the course prescribed to ourselves as journalists, precludes us from entering into the political discussions.—Our journal is strictly a Religious Herald. So far as we have observed, the religious papers at the South, with a single unimportant exception, have confined themselves strictly to their vocation.”
Perhaps the editor is counting on his white Southern readers having already forgotten that during the entirety of the war, the Southern Baptist press spent an inordinate amount of ink on political essays, editorials, commentaries and news items.
Or perhaps there is a tacit agreement among white Southern Baptists to forget altogether certain of their actions and words during the war. Selective amnesia, one might say.
The feigning of ignorance of their own past, however, serves the purpose of helping create a mythology of the recent past, a mythology that turns the white Confederacy’s destruction into a righteous ideological victory.
Truth be ignored, honesty be damned, and self-righteous ignorance glorified.
Source: “Secularity of the Northern Religious Press,” Religious Herald, November 26, 1865